This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Mar 24 15:36:02 CET 2005
mornin' joao,
>>> OK, so I guess my point altogether is that I dislike special-ness.
>>> There seems to be agreement that DNS anycasting is here to stay
>> and it's special enough to require special policy. i.e. one does
>> not have to like consistency to dislike specialness.
> one tries to limit it to the minimum.
so, in this case, would that be
o only tlds can get this specialness
o only dns services can get this specialness
o any anycasting services can get this specialness
o any services which can justify address space get the space
(which is what we theoretically have today)?
randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]