This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurtis Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Mar 24 13:22:20 CET 2005
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 24-mrt-05, at 13:00, Kurtis Lindqvist wrote: > > >>> _and_ filter anything that is longer than that. > > >> That's what it says in the documents > > > Those documents I assume is the 6bone routing guidelines document? > > No, this one/ones: > > http://lacnic.net/en/chapter-4.html > http://ftp.apnic.net/apnic/docs/ipv6-address-policy > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-policies.html > http://www.arin.net/policy/index.html#six43 > http://www.iana.org/ipaddress/ipv6-allocation-policy-26jun02 > > See section 4.3. Section 4.3 says : 4.3. Minimum allocation RIRs will apply a minimum size for IPv6 allocations to facilitate prefix-based filtering. The minimum allocation size for IPv6 address space is /32. I think I must have a very different understanding of the word "facilitate" than the rest of the world... - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]