[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2005-03-23, at 14.23, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
>>> Howeverm, the "out of a single block" is the part that really bothers
>>> me. Putting supposedly "critical infrastructure" as it is called
>>> elsewhere in a block that makes them all share fate in the event of
>>> network "optimisations" is still a bad idea.
>>
>> Well, this can be argued the otherway around as well. We know that 
>> ISPs
>> filter out previously unused space, and that they are not very active
>> in updating those filters when IANA starts allocating out of new
>> blocks. Having all in well-known block would limit that.
>
>   ...wouldn't we/you/they/all have to do some filtering the "other way
>   'round" if all of those prefixes are contained in _one_ superblock to
>   guard against someone/something announcing (and potentially black-
>   holeing(sp?)) a route for that /32?

Eh, I would assume there is no /32 to announce and that more specifics 
will always win.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQkHau6arNKXTPFCVEQKUhgCfWIZjB4+fjTez5hZNa/4pYPbCqLUAoJsI
0HcVTYcqA0SIVDxYFEuONSBk
=mmQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----