This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Anti-DoS BGP communities
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexander Koch
koch at tiscali.net
Wed Mar 2 12:11:29 CET 2005
On Wed, 2 March 2005 11:38:50 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 2-mrt-05, at 11:29, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > >Doing more-specific multihoming makes ONLY sense when planning to > >filter > >them at some point in time. Unfortunately at exactly this point, this > >scheme fails. This cannot be fixed in time and with education, this is > >a very fundamental problem of this approach. > > No, it's not. Keeping the aggregate up isn't hard to do, and all the > other stuff is even easier. "No, it's not." - don't you think you said a little too quick? Different network, different ppl, complexity++? How many routers did you say have internationally, and at what networks did you gain experience previously? Alexander -- Alexander Koch <koch at tiscali.net> / ako4-ripe Tiscali Int., Peering Coordination Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Anti-DoS BGP communities
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]