This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Wed Mar 2 11:38:50 CET 2005
On 2-mrt-05, at 11:29, Daniel Roesen wrote: > Doing more-specific multihoming makes ONLY sense when planning to > filter > them at some point in time. Unfortunately at exactly this point, this > scheme fails. This cannot be fixed in time and with education, this is > a very fundamental problem of this approach. No, it's not. Keeping the aggregate up isn't hard to do, and all the other stuff is even easier.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]