This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] FWD: [GLOBAL-V6] draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FWD: [GLOBAL-V6] draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FWD: [GLOBAL-V6] draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall Murphy niallm at enigma.ie
Thu Jul 14 15:47:26 CEST 2005

Thomas, all,

> I'd welcome discussion/feedback on it, and this list seems as good a
> place as any.
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

This is nit-picking, but for the sake of clarity:

2.7.  Utilization

   In IPv4, the utilization of a chunk of address space is defined as
   the ratio of the actual number of host assignments to the theoretical
   maximum number of host assignments. For example, a /24 in IPv4 can
   number 256 hosts [...]

A /24 can't number 256 hosts; it can number 254.

Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FWD: [GLOBAL-V6] draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FWD: [GLOBAL-V6] draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]