This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jul 11 09:26:32 CEST 2005
>>>> classically, if they have no plan to be connected, they don't get >>>> address space. >>> may have been true when the only network was ARPAnet. >>> with the advent of Internet, if you could demonstrate runing IP >>> you could get addresses (mostly true) >>> remember the "connected/unconnected" database? >> nope. sri internet days, netsol address days, ... even today, it >> says if you will be connecting to the network. > true... but the "network" has changed over time. so, what you actually mean is that you don't like the way things are and would like to change the status quo. that's discussable. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]