This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elmar K. Bins
elmi at 4ever.de
Mon Feb 28 16:21:33 CET 2005
jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) wrote: > >This obviously doesn't conform to current RIPE v4 policies. > >Discrepancy to be solved. > > > >Apart from this I can't see a way to get you out of your ivory tower... > > Which ivory tower? The one with the big banner to the other big ivory > tower containing the words that IPv4 routing policies do not equal the > ones for IPv6? More the like of that which Daniel referred to. Real-Life v6 will not happen unless certain infrastructure, often provided by end sites, is online. Maybe end sites need to be classified further. But then...let's await future discussions on the matter; I don't like preaching to walls, so maybe somebody else can turn the walls into something softer :-) Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2 at ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]