This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Mon Feb 28 15:00:33 CET 2005
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 14:54 +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote: >jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) wrote: > >> >That you and I cannot find more information might be subject to us not >> >having an employment contract with them... >> >> It does not matter if there is more information of not, they have >> qualified for the space and that is it. The point was that if others are >> not capable then that is really their problem, they demonstrated that it >> is possible, like many others. > >No. They are no end site (like you implicitly suspected), full stop. >The end site problem still persists. End sites should not get a entry in the global routing table. Full Stop ;) This is because end-sites are provided with IP by their upstreams. Full Stop. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050228/f54865cb/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]