This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Sat Feb 26 20:19:02 CET 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 25, 2005, at 19:28, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 25-feb-05, at 19:14, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > >>> Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and >>> those not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to >>> the APNIC >>> region, there even the .jp root has a /32.... > >> Well, in JP you also have to get your addresses from a NIR and you >> will >> have a local whoisdb in Japaneese...etc...it's a different model >> entirely. > > How is it different if this japanese /32 is in my routing tables? > > I'm getting pretty tired of this IP business. Maybe I should do > something easy for a living, like breeding flying pigs. I was referring to the fact that we don't have NIRs under RIPE. That is different. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQiDLqKarNKXTPFCVEQJT5gCfWLZiIZD6FHjJ5nmnq7L6LppLbwMAoICe xle15MbmI+STqX6Vww91q21d =m6EI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]