This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Feb 25 18:39:36 CET 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Elmar, On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > >> Everyone thinks they're special. That's how you get large routing >> tables. > > Who gets to decide? We're talking infrastructure here. > > ARIN seems to have a picture of specialness quite different from RIPE's > view. If you ask me, it's closer to what's needed. > > And I cannot see the v6 train pulling out of the yard before the > infrastructure all people are accustomed to does speak IPv6. And I > mean: In the way it speaks v4, not in a lab environment or in mini- > scale. In real life some things are more special than others. At the same time there are ccTLDs who are already running their slaves on IPv6.... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQh9i3aarNKXTPFCVEQI1SgCgu62f9KGM533PZe21vN4mFU0AqcUAoOm8 uesgJeVD4WOeKagJ70W67Z7v =JRIm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]