This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-12 New Policy Proposal (4-Byte AS Number Policy Proposal)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-12 New Policy Proposal (4-Byte AS Number Policy Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 New Draft Document Published (HD-ratio proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Thu Dec 29 11:38:05 CET 2005
On 28 Dec, 2005, at 21:38, Geoff Huston wrote: > > >>> - whether the specification of dates are reasonable in this context >> >> is this a question of whether the suggested dates are appropriate or >> whether any dates are appropriate? > > the latter - the ARIN discussion has appeared to head towards a > conclusion that the dates are the critical part of the proposal, > and to remove them from the proposal would make the entire exercise > somewhat meaningless. I concur with that view. > I do too. The way I read this text, the dates are the only real important content of this document. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-12 New Policy Proposal (4-Byte AS Number Policy Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 New Draft Document Published (HD-ratio proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]