This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for g loba l uniqe IP space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for g loba l uniqe IP space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Dec 23 14:57:13 CET 2005
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:03:06PM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
> [ globally unique ULAs ]
> Who would know more about this?
Geoff Houston mentioned that APNIC is researching this topic.
As for implementing it, the NRO/RIR structure sounds like a logical
candidate for me. They just need to make sure that it's adequately
lightweight so people won't need to pay thousands of Euro/Dollars to
get a ULA prefix.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for g loba l uniqe IP space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]