This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Dec 14 13:22:49 CET 2005
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:02:41PM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote: > quite sure there was a discussion about this some months back and most > people could agree on that a /56, maybe even /52 was a better size than > /48. But maybe it was on ipv6-wg at ripe.net ? I guess you mean this: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]