This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 12:13:15 CET 2005
On 12/7/05, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com <Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com> wrote: > > In regard to IP addressing policy, it is sufficient for the > RIRs to start doing things more wisely. If the RIRs would open > up another 1/8th of the IPv6 address space for geotop allocations > then they would no longer be blocking this solution. IIUC, the RIRs don't have another 1/8 of the space to "open up". they don't even have the whole of the first 1/8. IANA holds the global pool. The NRO *could* be helpful in lobbying for this, if their communities asked it of them. -- Cheers, McTim $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]