This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, Qatar, 17 - 18 January 2006: Updates to Agenda
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Dec 6 14:55:47 CET 2005
My apologies for replying to such an old message, but I couldn't let this one go. On 18-nov-2005, at 12:33, Sascha Lenz wrote: > In particular, noone came up with an equal solution to BGP Multihoming > with "PI"-space, which i hoped for back then. Well, you haven't been paying attention, because I've presented "provider-internal aggregation based on geography" at two different RIPE meetings a while ago. The only thing I got was perplexed stares. You really can't expect to keep doing the same thing we've been doing in IPv4 in IPv6 but now with different results (= more reasonable routing tables). Iljitsch -- I've written another book! http://www.runningipv6.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, Qatar, 17 - 18 January 2006: Updates to Agenda
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]