This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Mon Dec 5 19:14:33 CET 2005
Bonness, Olaf wrote: >Von: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net] >>"Every LIR gets a /32 (upon request), no questions asked" is a concept >>that I'm also happy with - as I have said before. For those that are >>afraid of the landrush: limit that policy to 5.000 LIRs per region. > > Not sure if that works. Kind of "First come - first serve" thing. > Regards Also, such a policy is most likely in direct conflict with one of the basic paradigms of a RIR - which is equal treatment of its members in equal circumstances. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]