This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fi x IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fi x IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Dec 5 18:58:30 CET 2005
Hi, On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:13:03PM +0100, Bonness, Olaf wrote: > > "Every LIR gets a /32 (upon request), no questions asked" is a concept > > that I'm also happy with - as I have said before. For those that are > > afraid of the landrush: limit that policy to 5.000 LIRs per region. > > Not sure if that works. Kind of "First come - first serve" thing. Yes, so what shall we do instead? "Nobody gets addresses, no mistakes made"? The whole point of this discussion is that there are two fractions: - one side is so afraid of doing the wrong thing that they want to delay everything until the perfect solution is found - the other side wants to get things rolling, and is willing to risk a few thousand entries in the global BGP table (whatever that is). and I don't think we'll ever reach consensus between those groups. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fi x IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]