This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Fri Dec 2 11:58:56 CET 2005
Hi Elmar, You wrote: > woeber at cc.univie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) wrote: > > > From ripe-357 ( > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/pi-requestsupport.html ), > > Supporting Notes for the Provider Independent (PI) > Assignment Request Form > > (which I know quite well) > > Yes, of course nobody guarantees routeability. That's impossible. > But even RIPE has changed PI assignment policy a couple of years > ago and doesn't give out longer-than-/24 any more. That's not quite right. There was no policy change introducing a minimum size for IPv4 PI assignments. PI assignments are made on the same basis as PA assignments. It's not unusual for people to request PI assignments longer than a /24 and we have made a couple of dozen so far this year. Regards, -- leo vegoda RIPE NCC Registration Services Manager
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]