This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Apr 22 10:45:43 CEST 2005
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:43:39AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Indeed. The idea behind the proposed change is (sort of) "those who can be > bothered to understand the system and become a LIR are allowed". I cannot see any requirement of "understanding the system", just "become a LIR", which boils down to "shell out enough money to RIPE NCC". Do you follow the illusion that LIRs are more clued on average than non-LIRs? Basically the proposal wants to change: "People who pay enough money to RIPE NCC and are ISPs (or lie convincingly enough) and claim a certain customer count projection" to "People who pay enough money to RIPE NCC and are ISPs (or lie convincingly enough)" Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]