This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
Thu Apr 21 12:58:11 CEST 2005
> Or are we lobbying for the criteria as a LIR to be relaxed...? YES! > Hosting suppliers are seemingly getting the raw end of this deal and > seen as IPv6 will be de fact one day and they need redundancy and > multi-path, etc. I would think now would be the time to accomodate them. Then they should come to Stockholm in May and state their case at the meeting. If they want to take RIPE to court or make a complaint to the European Competition Commission, they first have to attempt to solve the problem using the channels that exist for changing RIPE policies. It's that simple. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]