This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #beta: IPv4-HD-Ratio
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ICANN Calls for Comments on the Proposed Review Procedure for ASO Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #beta: IPv4-HD-Ratio
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido Roeskens
groeskens at bluewin.ch
Mon Apr 11 10:41:29 CEST 2005
Hello, we from Bluewin fully support the proposal Policy proposal: #beta: IPv4-HD-Ratio LIR: ch.bluewindow Vote: YES Comment: ISP's providing access services to many customers face several problems - Usage in different PoP's changes; at one time you have many customers in one PoP, at another time in others. You need to supply enough adresses to all PoPs even though they aren't needed all the time. - Assymetric usage of pools and redundancy To provide redundancy you overallocate some IP addresses to be able to handle the failure of single devices The pool usage on the devices and device groups are not balanced - RFC 3194 is as true for IPv4 as for IPv6 - consistency between IPv4 and IPv6 policies Kind regards, Guido Roeskens Swisscom Fixnet AG Bluewin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ICANN Calls for Comments on the Proposed Review Procedure for ASO Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #beta: IPv4-HD-Ratio
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]