This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Thu Apr 7 17:23:17 CEST 2005
Hi Mike, On Apr 7, 2005, at 11:35 am, Mike Hughes wrote: [...] > Can the NCC help by supplying some general statistics on IPv6 > allocations > (such as number rejected, and for what reason)? > > I seem to recall that we only seem to hear about successful allocations > made in the NCC reports. The number of rejections would probably make > far > more interesting reading/viewing. We are working on producing some statistics along these lines. If you'd like, I can prepare a presentation for RIPE 50 in May. Kind regards, -- leo vegoda Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]