how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>> My own, small consulting company (with dozens of customers) can
>> certainly promote v6, but I have no delusions of grandeour that it
>> would be best from the global perspective to allow such or even larger
>> companies, whether calling themselves ISPs or not, to obtain a /32.
>
> Would you - if I may ask - believe "such or even larger companies"
> to be eligible for an independently routable prefix at all, or,
> more clearly spoken, eligible for a slot int the global routing table?

They should never be in the global routing table.

> Under what circumstances would your idea of eligibility change?

That can be debated, but hopefully not in this thread or list. I'm 
asking you guys :)

Getting 200 real customers is one acceptable circumtance.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings