[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:40:24AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> >I guess you would agree with me that it's currently no problem at all
> >to obtain an ASN and IPv4 PI if you want to multihome. Right?
> 
> Umm.  The proposed v6 policy seems weaker than that?  AFAIR, you'll 
> have to justify half of the v4 address space.. and you don't even need 
> to do that to get a v6 block ?

Actually, as of today, IPv4 PI is much more convenient than the proposed
IPv6 policy: there is *no cost* attached to IPv4 PI.

(And the need to justify the address space is obviously something that
can be done - how hard is it for a not-so-small company to claim usage 
of 120 IPs?  - and those they really don't have that many machines, 
just think something up, to get a "routeable" chunk)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  71007  (66629)

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234