how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]

On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Oliver Bartels wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:13:59 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote:
>> Could you clarify, why do you think "200 customers" fails as a meter
>> for largeness ?
>
> Do you really think big is good, small is bad, and just the
> big ISP's will promote IPv6 ? [...]

Why do you think you require a /32 to "promote IPv6".  Don't answer.. 
it was a rhetoric question :)

My own, small consulting company (with dozens of customers) can 
certainly promote v6, but I have no delusions of grandeour that it 
would be best from the global perspective to allow such or even larger 
companies, whether calling themselves ISPs or not, to obtain a /32.

Is a bit of unselfishness too much to ask ?

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings