This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Apr 5 18:50:42 CEST 2005
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:00:11AM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: >> Now, a set of IPv6 policies in which no globally routable >> prefixes are longer than /32 allows router manufacturers >> to optimize memory usage and design router tables to only >> carry those 32 bits of the IPv6 address. > We don't have those policies. Supposed-to-be-globally-routable /48s do > already exist. heck, the fatal flaw with this clueles idiocy is that we don't want vendors hard coding anything like this. remember when a/b/c were hard coded in routers and in rip? of the stupid ideas we seem bent on repeating, this seems one of the worst. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]