This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Narten
narten at us.ibm.com
Tue Apr 5 16:32:23 CEST 2005
Jon Lawrence <jon at lawrence.org.uk> writes: > Is the number of routing table entries an issue ? only the > manufacturers can possibly tell us what routers may be able to > handle in 10 years time. That's not the whole story. I've heard on more than one occasion that there was another important component to the scaling question: operational management complexity. Technology won't necessarily solve that. Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]