This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Narten
narten at us.ibm.com
Tue Apr 5 16:26:23 CEST 2005
> If these policies cause 2000::/3 to be exhausted then there are 7 more > tries left to do it all over again. No. If we find that 2000::/3 is not enough, we've botched things badly through poor choices made today. Using the remaining space a long ways from now (e.g, in 30? 50 years?) would perhaps be OK. Needing to use it anytime in the next 10-20 years means we've botched it. Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]