[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:18:22PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> The problem is that PI isn't scalable.

It's as scalable as PA. There is no inherent difference in scaling how
many ISPs there are to the number of end users. Both grow in similar
progression. It's not like O(n) vs. O(n^2) or so.

So now start backing your "isn't scalable" claim (in comparision to PA).
And back that by hard numbers showing real problems.

> >There is no REAL multihoming without PI yet. And the IETF recently
> >narrowed down the road they want to take (solution space) that
> >guarrantees that the result won't fit people's needs. The multi6=>shim6
> >transition was (for me and quite a few others) the "end of all hope".
> 
> Why?

Because the outcome won't provide what people do ask for.


Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0