This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 5 14:34:46 CEST 2005
Hi, On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:31:32PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > >If they are willing to undergo the necessary paperwork, and pay the > >yearly fees, yes. > > Either having very many people get /32s is harmful, or it isn't. How > does paying the RIPE fee move this from "harmful" to "non-harmful"? It reduces the possible amount of applicants from "anybody out there" (many billions) to "anybody who thinks this is so important to his heart / business that he's willing to shell out serious money for it". This makes quite a difference, especially as it's not "one time up-front" money, but recurring fees. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]