[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 21:22 +0200, Oliver Bartels wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:17:04 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> >and we once thought 32 bits of address should be enough for ever
> If this policy discussion continues, and continues, and continues ...
> ... then 32 bits of address *will be* enough for ever.

To put it in another perspective:

If these policies cause 2000::/3 to be exhausted then there are 7 more
tries left to do it all over again.

And indeed the people in 2000::/3 who where early adopters will have the
advantage of getting a huge space easily, just like in IPv4 land.
But in IPv4 land there was not much left, in IPv6 there are another 7
tries to go before it is completely filled up...

Now folks get over it ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050404/0e5c4c93/attachment.sig>