[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:26:05PM +0100, Andy Furnell wrote:
> > I'd opt for:
> > 
> >     c) plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organisations and
> >     customers to which it will make assignments _according to the 
> >     rules specified in section 5.4.1_, and will advertise that 
> >     connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation.
> > 
> > just to make it clear that this change doesn't mean "/60s are fine now".
>  
> Exactly. 5.4.1 and RFC3177 are important for the sake of maintaining a
> coherent assignment policy, but the size of the assignments an LIR/ISP
> is planning on making (which we very much hope will be picked from the
> /48 /64 or /128 bucket as per that policy) should not impact their 
> ability to obtain an allocation in the first place...

OK, so we're all in violent agreement, are we? :-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  71007  (66629)

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234