This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Mon Apr 4 14:59:11 CEST 2005
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 14:40 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:57:42AM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > > 9. Summary of proposal: > > The proposal is to change the IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria > > outlined in the "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" > > (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6policy.html). The proposed > > change is to remove "have a plan for making at least 200 /48 > > assignments to other organisations within two years" and to > > I'm all for removing the 200-customer rule, as it's pointless... <SNIP> > So I'd go for a forward reference. Text proposal is below. /me goes with Gert, his version sounds completely sane IMHO. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050404/0b405ece/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]