This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 4 14:44:26 CEST 2005
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:13:20PM +0200, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> I guess that it may make sense to define a time frame here... i mean,
> an organization planning to provide IPv6 connectivity in 20 years would
> qualify here?
Yes. But how much harm can it do? This organization would eat up about
1/4294967296 of the address space, and pay a yearly fee to RIPE to
be permitted to keep it. Sounds like a fair deal to me.
If the address space is allocated and doesn't even end up in the routing
tables, even better.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]