This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Sat Oct 30 07:10:01 CEST 2004
Gert and all, There is no such thing in fact as "Rough Consensus", never has been. Such a concept is ephemeral at best. If consensus is measured in an open and transparent manner for all effected, than real consensus can be legitimately claimed.. Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Jon Lawrence wrote: > > As to the structure for changing policies (in the RIPE region) I believe that > > you simply post a possible 'new policy' to this group - perhaps contacting > > the WG-chairs before hand - and if there is enough support for the policy > > then it you present it at the next RIPE meeting. If there is support for the > > policy at the meeting then it will enter somekind of discussion phase prior > > to being accepted as policy - I'm sure Gert et all will put me right on > > this :) > > That's mostly the way it works today. > > Someone has an itch about the current policy, and proposes a change to the > list. > > The list discusses the proposal. > > "Most of the people are in favour of it" -> the proposal is formalized, > and re-circulated on the list (and discussed in the RIPE meetings). > > If we have "rough consensus" that this is the way to go forward, it's > incorporated into the existing policy. > > A somewhat more formal policy process is, right now, being worked upon, > and we're waiting for a formal policy proposal on the policy process to-be > from Rob Blokzijl :-) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 66629 (65398) > > SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 > 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299 Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]