This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Jun 25 09:59:27 CEST 2004
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:32:31AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Some of this small ISPs survive because they provide service to a reduced set of companies, but BIG companies ... So the size of the ISP doesn't mean necessarily that the addressing space they may need is not big !
Customer size is a non-argument for v6.
5 BIG COMPANIES will receive the same 5 /48s as 5 small dsl customers.
(Now if you offer dial-up services for all employees of 5 BIG COMPANIES,
you'll reach 200 end site assignments very quickly - so, again, no problem
with the 200-user rule here).
But I think the whole point of the discussion is that the rule is pretty
pointless.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]