This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 24 21:54:13 CEST 2004
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:05:09PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> 5) And even much further, should be mandatory for the ISPs, in a time frame of for example 5 years, to provide IPv6 services IF they want to keep their IPv4 allocations ?
No. It's not the address policy's job to force market developments
(it's worse enough already with the effects our policy has, but we should
not do that on purpose).
Our job is to make sure that numbers that must be globally unique are
distributed in a fair and balanced way.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]