This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Wed Jun 23 00:00:15 CEST 2004
Gert Doering; >>Note that routers in NLIs may have less performance than those >>in TLIs. > Why? Because with minimum peering global traffic concentrates on peerings between TLIs and because minimum links make the traffice concentrate on backbone links of TLIs. With extra links, extra peerings and associated policies, it is possible to reduce the concentration or even have an NLI link carry more traffic than links of TLIs. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]