[address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> On 2004-06-22, at 16.51, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> 
> >> Ok, so you are actually proposing that we
> > I'm actually proposing that you read the draft, if you
> > are interested in multi6 issues.
> For the record for the RIPE address policy WG, I will take this 
> discussion over to multi6 only.

I would appreciate if you could send us an "executive summary", so 
that people over here that are not so well-versed in the different
multi6 proposals can try to judge the benefits and costs of this
proposal.

Something that right now confuses *me* is:  If I understand this
correctly, the 'default-free zone' is meant to be kept below 1000
routes, so routers can be fast.  But what about the internal 
structure of all these networks?  At least the "internal core" boxes
need to know all routes for the "NLI"s (or the NLIs' customers), which 
might well be many 1000s...

thanks,

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  60210  (58081)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299