This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Tue Jun 22 14:09:40 CEST 2004
Kurt Erik Lindqvist; >>A simple way to do so is to allow TLAs only to national IRs. Can you beahve fair to quote properly. I wrote: >>A simple way to do so is to allow TLAs only to national IRs. >> >>There are other ways, too. > What is a "national IR"? National Internet Registry? What about > corporations that fall outside the nation boundary? Who controls the > national IRs? What are the rules they operate by? What do we gain with > this over RIRs? For example, in my draft you actively ignored, I wrote: For example, some TLA may be supplied from RIRs with bidding. Some TLA may be allocated to each country (proportional to the population of the country) and delivered with the countrie's policy. As you have chances to ask questions, you are supposed to understand the meanings of the examples of the draft. Or, you can say that you have never been interested in mult6 issues. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]