[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:08:09AM +0100, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> > > This doesn't fly. He can't set his own routing policy and he can't 
> > > multihome. If he changes the single upstream his customers needs to 
> > > renumber.
> > As of today, "more-specific BGP multihoming" works.  So he *can* set
> > his own routing policy.
> 
> Can you personaly garantee the upstream suplying the space won't aggregate
> his prefix ? 

And if he does, so what?  He will loose traffic, as the *other* ISP 
will make the more specific visible world-wide, and thus no paid-for
packets will arrive at the aggregating upstream.

Using a more-specific block out of PA space is a well-established
technique in IPv4 today.  It's not "beautiful", but it works better
than other variants.

> If you can't this just turned a nice IPv6 space rental setup.

Huh?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  60210  (58081)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299