This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Tue Jun 22 11:04:50 CEST 2004
Hi Mohsen, http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/rir-comparison.html Looking at the LACNIC site, I believe this is not updated. I think same for ARIN. Regarding the critical infrastructure, I fully support a policy change on this in RIPE. Regards, Jordi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mohsen Souissi" <Mohsen.Souissi at nic.fr> To: "David Kessens" <david at iprg.nokia.com> Cc: "Laura Cobley" <laura at ripe.net>; <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)" > David & all, > > On 21 Jun, David Kessens wrote: > | > | Laura, > | > | On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Laura Cobley wrote: > | > > | > During the following discussions, the RIPE NCC was asked to co-ordinate > | > work on clarifying the text. Please note that we do not intend to > | > propose any policy changes. > | > | During the meeting, I asked you not to waste your time on this. Since > | the policy is already changing in the other regions, our time would be > | better spend to move forwards, instead of stalling the policy > | development process by spending time on 'clarifications'. > | > | I would like to ask the working group whether we can ask the RIPE NCC > | to summarize the different changes made to the policy in the other > | regions, so that we can have a discussion on which changes are > | appropriate. > > ==> If it is deemed that it would be worth proceeding now to the > Policy change (instead of simply clarifing it as it was initially > intended), let me please draw your attention to the following web page > at APNIC site, which compares RIR implementations of the global IPv6 > Policy and which may be useful as a start: > > http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/rir-comparison.html > > By the way, you can have a look at section 3.4.1 ("Critical > Infrastructure") which describes, AFAIK, somtehing which is > implemented only in APNIC region and which would be useful for ccTLDs > in Europe (for instance, .de and .fr to name a few of them). > > Regards, > > Mohsen. > > ********************************** Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit Presentations and videos on line at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]