[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

> I dimly remember that it was *you* that argued very much in favour
> of "give /48s to every end site

not exactly.  i argued against it within the ivtf; thinking it was
a bit short.  and i was also against assigning /48s to dialu-ups.
but when i presented the ivtf position, i presented the ivtf position,
not my personal opinion.

> "A networks are too big" doesn't really hold - if anything, /32s are
> too small.

might it not depend on the size of the network?  that is a lesson
we learned in cidr back in the early '90s.  how many times do we need
to learn it?

randy