[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 01:07:26PM +0100, Sascha Luck wrote:
> A strict interpretation of the policy might help to get dome discussion going 
> since, clearly, few memebers of the community are happy with it.

I tend to disagree with that statement.  Over 360 allocations have been
made, so I'd say (again) that the policy seems to be working fairly well
for a number of people.

People have voiced complaints about unclear wording in the policy, and this
needs to be fixed.

Some people have complained about the "200 customers" rule, and this 
certainly needs discussion.   

*One* person is taking major offence at not being allowed to play with 
the big boys.  This is to be expected if the community decides to draw
a line at "who gets an allocation, who doesn't".  Democratic procedures
aren't necessarily *nice* to everybody.

I count that as "one member is very unhappy, and a few others have 
sore spots", which is something different from "clearly, few members 
are happy"...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  60210  (58081)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299