This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jun 21 16:47:33 CEST 2004
> OTOH, I'd hate to see the same mistakes (that seemed reasonable at the > time) that were made in the v4 sunrise period be repeated in v6, like: > > * too small assignments for customers forcing NAT in use, v4 sunrise had too BIG, not too small, assignments. hence all the underpopulated As abd Bs. it took a major war, cidrd, to fix that. and yes your point holds; we're doing it again. those who forget history are condemned to repeat it. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]