[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-06-21, at 11.58, Carlos Morgado wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:41:05PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
>>
>> If we still agree that we don't want to give /32's to enterprises, toy
>> ISPs without any real number of customers (hey! my consulting company
>> has two connectivity customers as well, should I get a /32 prefix?),
>> or such, we have to keep in some checks.
>>
>
> Have we figured out how to make multihoming work without giving 
> multihomed
> networks their own prefix like in v4 ?

Depends on your definition of "figured out". At the multi6 WG interim 
meeting last week we got down to 6 proposal from 32. And I think those 
6 will come down to two fairly shortly. Then all we need to do is 
develop and implement it...

I suggest joining the multi6 mailinglist. Instructions at 
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQNa0LKarNKXTPFCVEQJFMgCfUoFi2ji1/2P+IxgUH2gkx+rRbYYAn1ph
iwNvR0h/6q9c5bD1ZMnTb5ao
=TuZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----