This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 17 21:47:36 CEST 2004
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:20:49PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> I saw that -- but I don't see *any* justification for this
> interpretation. Remember, the goal is to require 200 assignments to
> *other* organizations, not be satisfied that you can make 200
> assignemnts to your internal network, or 100 assignments to your
> internal network and 100 to other organizations!
*I* always thought the primary goal was to get IPv6 deployed...
(and the "200" number is in there to get some sort of rough filter to
get only those IPv6 "adaptors" that really want to do some sort of
IPv6 distribution to third parties)
Gert Doering
(speaking mainly as IPv6 user, not as co-chair)
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]