[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

On Thursday 17 June 2004 10:20, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> I saw that -- but I don't see *any* justification for this
> interpretation.  Remember, the goal is to require 200 assignments to
> *other* organizations, not be satisfied that you can make 200
> assignemnts to your internal network, or 100 assignments to your
> internal network and 100 to other organizations!

And this is part of the problem.
We won't be rolling IPv6 out ot 200 customers any time soon.
So we can't get an allocation. Thus we can't run trials with IPv6.
I really fail to see the reason behind the 200 other organisation rule - 
perhaps somee one would like to explain the logic.

Jon