This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Jun 17 09:59:46 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Because the original text required that the assignments are made to > the *other* organizations. By all logic, only the assignments to the > others should count. > > In any case, your own infrastructure shouldn't take more than a /48 or > something like that, so it wouldn't be useful to count it either: 199 > or 200 makes no difference -- this would become bad if you could just > assign e.g. /38 to your own infrastructure and state you've > already assigned worth of 200 /48's. See the email from Amar. Also, if you have several operating companies you might want to have separate assignments for each of them. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNFPdqarNKXTPFCVEQKQFQCfb5RaQrTHk8tX+eBRTa7sRuRwJ/wAnipW 4D9dXvdbynovbsdHahJjB3ye =Wihj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]